Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Fear gone, pain healed

When I was in college, I still wore hard contact lenses. You remember those, the tiny tough concave disks, colored light blue so you could see them if you dropped them, with the little black dot on one of them so you could tell left from right.

Frankly, they seem barbaric now! But back then, they were the best options aside from glasses. But they were also a pain to deal with, so I didn't wear them regularly. I only wore them when I cared about how I looked, and friends from back then can testify that I had at best a casual attitude toward appearance.

One weekend, when I was home for a visit, I woke in the middle of the night in extreme pain. My eyeballs felt like someone was scratching them with needles. I staggered into my mother's room and she tried to help me as best as she could. I thought I was going blind. I thought, This is it, it's all over, life ends as I know it. The pain increased with the intensity of the fear, with no sign of stopping.

When the hour became more reasonable (daylight), we phoned our family Christian Science practitioner, who began treating me through prayer. The pain eased some, but not the fear. I still couldn't open my eyes, and tears flowed non-stop. As soon as normal office hours hit, we made an emergency appointment with my optometrist, and he saw me right away.

The verdict? I'd abused my contact lenses by wearing them so irregularly. No, I wasn't going blind. No, there wouldn't be any permanent damage. Yes, I should think about switching to the newfangled soft contact lenses that were just becoming available. The eye doctor prescribed some pain killers because he felt I'd be experiencing the pain for several more days.

But here's where the funny thing happened. Once he told me I wasn't going blind, the pain eased appreciably. The fear was gone, you see. We called the practitioner and told her the results of the doctor's visit, and didn't fill the prescription. With the practitioner's continued treatment, I was free from serious pain by lunchtime. I was able to keep an important appointment that afternoon (albeit wearing glasses). The next day you couldn't see there had been any problem. I got soft contacts shortly thereafter.

This taught me several lessons about fear. First, my fear had made the physical symptoms worse. If I had been able to remain calm, to trust, to breathe, I wouldn't have needed to experience the pain. The pain itself didn't have any objective reality, it was an outward expression of my worst-case scenario imagination. Pain is a phantom, a figment.

Second, once released from fear, my physical body responded quickly to rational thought and prayer. The doctor could only project what my future comfort level would be based on the physical evidence before him, so he thought it would last several days. But when you add in the power of metaphysics, harmony can be quickly restored.

Third, sometimes it's helpful to know what's going on. I'm grateful to the doctor for letting me know this wasn't a big deal. I have no idea how it would have gone if he'd confirmed my worst fears, but in this circumstance, knowing what was going on physically helped me overcome the fear. Sometimes things aren't as big a deal as our imaginations make them.

Over the years I've become convinced that it's not that pain is *caused* by fear, but that pain *is* fear. Pain is simply fear given physicality. So pain can shut off like a spigot when fear is drained. Pour in spiritual truth instead, and put your mind—and body—at ease.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Consciousness is more than brain

The current issue of TIME featured a huge section on the brain, which I slogged through to see what, if anything, I could learn. Article after article explored the physical side to thought, emotion, sensation—things which I don't really believe are physical.

But the section ended with an intriguing piece, The Power of Hope, by Columbia's Scott Haig, M.D. (I've linked to it, but only read it if you're okay with some gruesome physical descriptions.) Haig had a patient whose brain had apparently gone through the ravages of disease. The brain physically wasn't there anymore, and the medical staff was preparing the family for the patient's imminent demise. But then the patient actually regained consciousness, spoke plainly to his family, shared some tender moments, was even affectionate, for about five minutes. He then slipped back into unconsciousness and passed on within the hour.

Haig writes:

[I]t wasn't David's brain that woke him up to say goodbye that Friday. His brain had already been destroyed. …

What woke my patient that Friday was simply his mind, forcing its way through a broken brain, a father's final act to comfort his family. The mind is a uniquely personal domain of thoughts, dreams and countless other things, like the will, faith and hope. These fine things are as real as rocks and water but, like the mind, weightless and invisible, maybe even timeless. …

I see the mind have its way all the time when physical realities challenge it. In a patient stubbornly working to rehab after surgery, in a child practicing an instrument or struggling to create, a mind or will, clearly separate, hovers over the machinery, forcing it toward a goal. It's wonderful to see, such tangible evidence of that fine thing's power over the mere clumps of particles that, however pretty, will eventually clump differently and vanish.

This, to me, is a compelling example of what Mary Baker Eddy tried to show us with Christian Science—that consciousness, identity, exists separate from the body and brain, and that consciousness can supersede physical conditions even in extreme cases.

Haig speaks of the will as a powerful force. Christian Science takes it one step farther and reveals the only will as divine. The reason this works, the reason that we can break through material conditions on any occasion, is that there exists a supreme power that is entirely spiritual. Our mind has dominion over matter because all consciousness is an emanation of the divine Mind. Our will for good can overcome obstacles because it reflects the divine will, which is omnipotent good.

You could say the same for our capacity for unconditional love, for unselfish honesty, for joy in the face of anguish. These things all extend from our Creator, infinite Love, Truth, Spirit. We don't originate these things—we express these things because we were created to do so.

None of these things are connected to or dependent on a body or a brain. In fact, I would say that it's these things that animate the body, not the other way around. It's my consciousness that makes the brain work, not the brain giving me consciousness. This means that as I think, so I am. And I can control my thoughts.

I wish TIME would spend more "time" on subjects like these. I'll bet there's a lot of evidence out there for MBE's Science, if we'd only acknowledge the place of consciousness in the equation.

Consciousness constructs a better body when faith in matter has been conquered. Correct material belief by spiritual understanding, and Spirit will form you anew.

--Science and Health


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Monday, January 29, 2007

Myths are always true

Can you be grateful for things you're not sure happened?

Watching Dreamworks' The Prince of Egypt over the weekend (yet again!), I was moved (yet again!) by the opening sequence where Moses' mother saves him from the swords of Pharaoh's soldiers. Later, when Moses finds the burning bush, when the Hebrews begin their exodus, when the sea parts before them and they reach the other shore, the emotion I felt can be described in no other way than gratitude. I actually stopped for a moment to thank God for the salvation of the Hebrews through these events.

Now, my rational mind knows that the exact nature of these events is uncertain. The movie, in fact, doesn't even agree with the Bible on some points. Yet there I was, moved to tears at some points, grateful that these events happened so that I could be blessed by them today.

Is it important whether or not they actually happened? I'm in the middle of a fascinating book, No god but God by Reza Aslan, about the early Muslim years. (I'll write more about it when I'm finished.) Here's a passage from the prologue (which asserts that stories about early Islam are grounded in mythology):

It is a shame that this word, myth, which originally signified nothing more than stories of the supernatural, has come to be regarded as synonymous with falsehood, when in fact myths are always true. [Emphasis added.] By their very nature, myths inhere both legitimacy and credibility. Whatever truths they convey have little to do with historical fact. To ask whether Moses actually parted the Red Sea, or whether Jesus truly raised Lazarus from the dead, or whether the word of God indeed poured through the lips of Muhammad, is to ask totally irrelevant questions. The only question that matters with regard to a religion and its mythology is "What do these stories mean?"

The fact is that no evangelist in any of the world's great religions would have been at all concerned with recording his or her objective observations of historical events. They would not have been recording observations at all! Rather they were interpreting those events in order to give structure and meaning to the myths and rituals of their community, providing future generations with a common identity, a common aspiration, a common story. After all, religion is, by definition, interpretation; and by definition, all interpretations are valid.

Aslan's words (funny that this Muslim's scholar's name is the same as the Christ figure in the Narnia books) is clarifying for me something that I've always wondered about—why Mary Baker Eddy's autobiography is not more detailed about the events in her life. But now I can see better that she was writing to share the meaning of the events. You can see this especially in the section "Emergence into Light."

The fact that a common story is shared by so many people has a power to it. We unite in exploring the same story, and in this way find common ground to build a sense of oneness. The meaning of the story is always true, even if the facts of the story are not. Truth exists separate from human events.

Myths are always true. Does that mean facts are always false? This is a bit mind-bending for me this Monday morning—what do you think?

Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Unsure what will happen now!

Hello, friends! (7:25am)

Blogger has just announced they are forcing my blog to switch to a newer version. I'm not sure how this will pan out, and I have no way of knowing what elements of my blog will stay intact and which will disappear. It may take me a few days to sort things out. So stay in touch! I'll be back shortly.

With love,
Laura

-----------------------------
UPDATE (9:10am)

Phew! Everything seems to be working fine, except the del.icio.us tags, and I hope to develop a workaround for that (because I like those tags better than the ones blogger is providing).

So, we're still in business. Thanks for your prayers and support!

Laura


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Del.icio.us tags:

Friday, January 26, 2007

Mind's intention for you

About a month and a half ago ago, I had a bit of a panic. Sometimes when I look too closely at cashflow, I get a bit, well, worried. Anxious. Stressed. Um, terrified. This was one of those times, compounded by it being end-of-year and Christmas and kid's plane tickets and traveling… etc. Inflow was just not matching outflow, and I didn't think I could do anything about it.

I made the standard cost-cutting moves and took another look at the numbers. It seemed the only option I had was to reduce the single biggest expense—housing. Meaning, I had to seriously start thinking about selling my house and downsizing.

Boy, did this bother me. I love my little house. It's all snug and bright and filled with memories. The thought of packing up and moving gave me this nasty feeling in the pit of my stomach. I hated the idea, but thought I had to face reality and be a grown up. It's just a house, right?

My prayers at first were kind of desperate. What should I do, Lord? Where do you want me? What's best for the kids? I didn't instantly achieve peace, but I also didn't get any strong impulse to put my house on the market. I tried to stay willing and flexible, all the while wincing at the idea of moving.

Gradually, though, when the sky didn't fall and the earth didn't come to an end, I regained some calm. Some funds came in, for which I am very grateful. Also, I was glad to be reading through the Gospel of Matthew with my church. I spent some time with the "take no thought" section. It says, "Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? ... But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you."

While I can't claim to be 100% about seeking the kingdom of God all the time, it is a priority in my life. Could I just trust the equation then? That if I make righteousness-seeking a priority, all that I need will be there? This line of thinking allowed me to feel calm again. I began to breathe more easily, and to trust.

Then I got an idea. Two ideas, actually.

When my kids were home for Christmas, neither of them used the bedrooms. They either slept and hung out in the basement or at friends'. One day when I was praying, I was suddenly inspired by the idea of thinking of the house as an asset rather than a liability. I realized I had two empty rooms—this is actually an asset. What about getting a roommate? My first ad on Craig's List went up that day.

This idea really cheered me up. I felt blessed by abundance rather than strapped by limitation. One morning right after Christmas, I woke up to this wonderful warm sense of the presence of the Christ. I just did not feel alone, but partnered with the Divine. In my email box that morning were some responses to my ad. I haven't found a roommate yet, but I'm very encouraged by the response and feel it will happen soon enough.

Next, I got an idea for my writing business. Part of the problem was being a victim of my own success—I was getting in more writing work than I could handle. I was afraid I would have to start turning things away. I also wanted to keep time available for the spiritual work I do, like writing this blog and helping people through prayer. So, the idea came to network more with other writers. I began to investigate forming sort of a coalition of writers that I could find work for, blessing both them and me. The writers I approached with this idea were enthusiastic. We got the idea rolling last week.

Both of these ideas have expanded my universe. I now have a broader sense of the possibilities. I no longer feel trapped by the worst case scenario of having to move. There are always options.

The point of all this for me is just how powerful ideas are. It's divine Mind's intention that you express infinitude, not limitation, so it's sending the ideas you need constantly. I believe Mind is the source of all ideas, and that freeing your thought from fear allows you to become conscious of the idea you need when you need it.

Take a deep breath, calm your thought, trust, and listen. You are not alone. The idea you need is right there.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Desiderata

Who remembers this? I stumbled on it online the other day, and it just sunk into me over long-forgotten grooves. I had it on a parchment poster a long time ago that got torn or something so discarded. But the words remain fresh to me. Reading it through again is like the hug of an old friend. I'd be interested to know who else knows it.

Desiderata

Go placidly amid the noise and haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible without surrender
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly;
and listen to others,
even the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story.

Avoid loud and aggressive persons,
they are vexations to the spirit.
If you compare yourself with others,
you may become vain and bitter;
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans.

Keep interested in your own career, however humble;
it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs;
for the world is full of trickery.
But let this not blind you to what virtue there is;
many persons strive for high ideals;
and everywhere life is full of heroism.

Be yourself.
Especially, do not feign affection.
Neither be cynical about love;
for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment
it is as perennial as the grass.

Take kindly the counsel of the years,
gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune.
But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings.
Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.
Beyond a wholesome discipline,
be gentle with yourself.

You are a child of the universe,
no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God,
whatever you conceive Him to be,
and whatever your labors and aspirations,
in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful.
Strive to be happy.

Max Ehrmann, Desiderata, Copyright 1952.

Hope you just re-met an old friend, or made a new one.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Getting involved in politics

I have to admit the political swirl has caught my attention. Double headers of Hillary's Internet conversations and George's State of the Union have my inner debater going in full swing. What's right? What's wrong? Who knows?

As a tempering tactic, though, I'm also currently reading through this little pamphlet of Mary Baker Eddy's, The People's Idea of God. Last night I found this gem:

Proportionately as the people's belief of God, in every age, has been dematerialized and unfinited has their Deity become good; no longer a personal tyrant or a molten image, but the divine Life, Truth, and Love, — Life without beginning or ending, Truth without a lapse or error, and Love universal, infinite, eternal. This more perfect idea, held constantly before the people's mind, must have a benign and elevating influence upon the character of nations as well as individuals, and will lift man ultimately to the understanding that our ideals form our characters, that as a man "thinketh in his heart, so is he."

This reminds me of the survey I wrote about a few months ago, the one that showed that your concept of God has a pronounced relationship to what you believe politically and socially. To quote myself: "[Your concept of God is] a better predictor of where you might stand on the issues like stem cells or abortion or gay marriage than your region or party affiliation."

So it seems MBE has her finger on the pulse when she says that dematerializing and unfiniting (great word) the people's belief in God will have a "benign and elevating influence."

It's occurring to me this morning, then, that I could have more of an influence on the political debate if I spend my effort spreading MBE's concept of God. If we knew that divine Life, Truth, and Love are in control, what would our government look like? How would we care for our citizenry? How empowered would each individual be, how free from limits or prejudices? What would universal health care look like? Full employment? Equality?

Now that's a vision—to have all these things occur naturally and not need a human government to impose them. And it's all possible from a more spiritualized idea of God.

I'm going to vote. I might even volunteer for a campaign. But my real involvement has got to go deeper if I really want to make a difference for good. I can, myself, mentally "vote" for an uplifted concept of God, every day.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Del.icio.us tags:

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Fun factoids about Mark

Last night I attended with the small group at my church who are reading the four Gospels together. We did Matthew last month, and last night we focused on Mark.

From what we know about Mark, it was the first Gospel written, and most likely by a student of the disciple Peter. He was writing primarily to already converted Christians, shortly after the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem by Rome.

One woman in the group pointed out how she'd never read Mark straight through. She'd been a reader at our church, a position which required her to frequently assemble readings, and she confessed she'd seldom used the versions of the stories in Mark. Other gospels present longer versions that are a little more crafted. But Mark is written with sparse detail, flowing from one story to another with nary a pause.

She drew our attention to the words "immediately" and "straightway." The Bible has 55 instances of the word "immediately," 17 of which are in Mark. (Remember, Mark is also the shortest gospel in length.) There are 42 instances of "straightway," 18 of which are in Mark. Mark has a sense of urgency, or immediacy. Things are happening. Right now. And not stopping.

Which brings me to her contribution that really made my eyes pop. If you have a version of the King James handy, open it up to Mark. And just scan down the verses. What word pops out as the first of almost every verse? See if you can see it before I tell you. … It's the word "and." Mark wrote in these breakneck run-on sentences that just kept going and going and going without stopping and added more and more information and details and episodes without him even pausing for a breath.

Phew!

Another point is that Mark uses a "sandwich" structure, meaning he'll start one story, break off to tell another story, then go back and resolve the first story. The point is for one story to give meaning to the other story, and vice versa. This clarified for me that whole episode with the fig tree.

You may remember it, it's in Chapter 11. Jesus and his disciples have just gone into Jerusalem and visited the temple. Jesus is gearing up for his cleansing of the temple but hasn't done it yet. The next day, they travel again from Bethany to Jerusalem, and on the way Jesus sees a fig tree. It's all leaves and no figs. (Someone pointed out last night that the bit about it not being "time" for figs was probably added later.)

I imagine that Jesus was thinking about what he's about to do in the temple, he's thinking about worthless activities and how they bear no fruit. And then he sees this useless fig tree and he remarks, "No man [will] eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever." [Bracket is my addition.]

Then Jesus gets to the temple and throws out the moneychangers. He rebukes the scribes and chief priests, saying, "Is it not written, My house shall be called of nations the house of prayer? But ye have made it a den of thieves." This angers the officials.

Jesus and the disciples leave the city again, coming back in the morning. Peter (remember Mark may have been Peter's student) notices the fig tree has dried up, and he exclaims, "Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away." To me, this is Peter's take on the incident. Jesus doesn't necessarily confirm it. Jesus answers, "Have faith in God." He goes on to explain that whatever you want to do, if you shall not doubt in your heart, God will do it. He also adds that you need to forgive to be forgiven.

They then get to Jerusalem, Jesus does the little brain teaser with the priests about who gave him his authority, and then he launches into his parable (Chapter 12) about the man leaving the vineyard to some husbandmen. The man sends servants to claim the fruit, but the husbandmen refuse to deliver it. They beat the servants. Finally they even kill the man's son. Jesus says, "What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others." The priests know that he's talking about them, and they start to plot to kill him.

To me, now, this whole section is about bearing fruit. About how following God needs to bring results and increased goodness. It's not about just following rules and expecting that to save you. You have to be true to what God has designed you to do, or your efforts will be as worthless as fig tree that only bears leaves.

I found the discussion with my fellow Gospel readers very inspiring. There were just a few of us, but we were caught up together in discovery. Can't wait for the discussion of Luke.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Monday, January 22, 2007

The revolution is here

I've never read such a short book that was so quotable.

George Barna's Revolution: Finding vibrant faith beyond the walls of the sanctuary is a quick, scary read. Quick, in that it's 140 pages. Scary, in that he puts forth very plainly the revolution that is occurring throughout Christianity and the resistance it will bring in consequence.

I have to say up front that I do not agree with Barna's theology, to the extent that he probably wouldn't consider me a Christian. But what he's saying about the movement he's spent his life studying applies in many points to what I've been observing amidst my own.

Basically, he's highlighting a movement of unchurched adherents who are still passionate about the teaching and living it in their lives. They have left their local churches not because they are irreligious, but because they're *too* religious, and the church hasn't kept up with them. They find community in smaller connections, and they find a sense of mission by devoting their entire lives to the cause.

This is, apparently, freaking out the local churches. Pastors are thumping their Bibles maintaining that being unchurched is unbiblical. But Barna presents a strong case through biblical research that the church as it exists today (congregants gathering weekly in a building) was not what early Christians experienced or expected. So there's nothing inherently misguided about following a different path. Barna calls those who do so "Revolutionaries."

Here's some parts of his book that especially resonated with me:

Know this: just as the prophets of old were unwelcome in their own hometown, so are Revolutionaries looked at askance by even their closest friends and family members. The skepticism of those who lead conventional spiritual lives is a palpable reminder that growth always comes with a price tag.

In the end, the Revolution transforms believers so that they can transform the world. Their perception of faith becomes more real and personal. Their relationship with God becomes more natural and intimate. … The very life of the believer becomes a means of worship and outreach. Tent-making—the practice of working at a non-religious job as a means of paying the bills while facilitating one's desire to be a genuine representative of Christ in the world—moves from a quirky, first-century idea to a defining, personal lifestyle.

Existing churches have a historic decision to make: to ignore the Revolution and continue business as usual, to invest energy in fighting the Revolution as an unbiblical advance, or to look for ways of retaining their identity while cooperating with the Revolution as a mark of unity and genuine ministry. My current research suggests the latter approach will be the least common.

The Affirmations of a Revolutionary [partial list]

  • God created me for His purposes. My desire as a Revolutionary is to fulfill those ends, and those ends alone. When I get out of bed each day, I do so for one purpose: to love, obey, and serve God and His people.
  • I am not called to attend or join a church. I am called to be the Church.
  • Worship is not an event I attend or a process I observe; it is the lifestyle I lead.

Even though I know Barna doesn't mean me, I still became energized reading his book. The more time I spend online with folks who want to explore Christian Science, the more I think I'm tapping into something similar—an on-fire group of people who want to engage with the ideas more deeply and fully, who do not want to be judged but supported, who do not want to theorize about spirituality but to experience it directly.

Christian Science itself is revolutionary. Are you part of the revolution within the revolution?


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Friday, January 19, 2007

It's been a Webby week

This week has been all about expanding my understanding of the Web. The week started out with a very inspiring conference call with fellow Christian Science bloggers (hi, guys!), then moved to spending a lot of time poking around a Web site hosting service and playing with a bunch of tools such as discussion boards and classified ads. Finally, a couple days ago, I signed up for Facebook.

With the Facebook signup, I'm suddenly reconnected with a bunch of my friends who are in college. Now I come to find out they've been having this entire virtual existence, complete with conversations, specialized groups, photos, messaging, all sorts of stuff. I *love* it. Gives me something new to check every day, but I get to be connected to all these cool people.

The Web contains entire universes. Facebook, LinkedIn, iTunes, Bloglines, del.icio.us, LibraryThing—each one has not only its own content, but its own rules and functionality. You have to learn how to get around, but once you do, these are amazing tools. Amazing universes, that are taking up *no space.* You can access each one of them without moving, and can hop from one to the other.

Sometimes Sunday School students have asked me, How can it be that there is no time or space in the perfect spiritual creation? Don't you need space? Don't you need time? To me the Web is a primo example of how we don't need space to exist. It's all mental—it's all idea. My online interactions with my friends are just as substantive as face-to-face ones, because it's not about the physical form of the interaction but about the ideas we share. Ideas are real in any form.

The Web is like a final frontier of ideas that keeps moving westward just as you get to the edge. There's no end in sight to the innovations. It really keeps getting better and better.

Sure, there are threats to the Web's usefulness, and it's interesting to note that some of these threats have disease-oriented names, like "viruses" and "worms." Perhaps those of us who are benefiting so much from the Web can take this as a clue to prayerfully support its continued health and wellbeing. Same as we pray for our community, or pray for our workplace, praying for the Web environment can only help it stay in top condition.

For all its weirdness, I celebrate the Web. At this point, I can't imagine a world without it.


The divine Science of man is woven into one web of consistency without seam or rent. --Science and Health

Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Del.icio.us tags:

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Only as much as you need

The other day I was startled by the sound of raucous chirping. Hundreds of birds in a flock (they were grackle-type) had descended on my backyard, and were pecking away at the grass and all my bird feeders. Amazed at this feathered scene, I didn't even mind that they were probably going to strip my yard bare and I'd have to replenish all the feeders.

But they didn't. They stayed for about ten minutes, nibbling and pecking, and then they all just looked around and took off. Together. Amazing. And it occurred to me that they had just eaten what they needed to get where they were going.

This was comforting to me somehow. They're on a journey, but they travel light. They just pick up what they need as they go. It's right there waiting for them when they get there, and what they need will be at the next stage as well.

It reminds me of Jesus' counsel: "Take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? … for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you" (Matthew).

Seeking the kingdom is the journey we're on. I reckon no one can really escape that journey, whether they'd call it that or not. The kingdom can be thought of as happiness, as success, as fulfillment, but in the end it's all the same destination. Jesus is giving us the road map to get there: acknowledge that it's about the Divine, and make it a first priority. And, he's telling us that everything will be okay on the way.

The comforting thing to me this morning is that Spirit doesn't store everything up to give to us when we get there. It's coming to us as we need it, constantly. Almost like little breadcrumbs strewn before sparrows, leading them across a park. Divine Love is leading us toward itself, supplying our needs and inviting us onward.

So then a corollary to this is that I don't need to be greedy. I'm going to have what I need, that's certain. So I don't need to hoard or take more than my share or waste resources. I can live in harmony with creation because we're all being cared for, as we go.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Spiritual breakthroughs

There's been so many comments in here about Richard Bach's Jonathan Livingston Seagull and my daughter gave it to so many of her friends over Christmas that I dug out my old copy and sat down to experience it again. (Read the entire text here.)

My copy is one of the earliest, from 1971. It includes black & white seagull photos, along with a section of parchment pages with bird-in-flight images that functions like a flipbook. If you flip the pages real fast, you can see the bird landing on the rocky shore. I remember this fascinating me when I was ten. I would flip and flip again.

In the story, Jonathan pushes himself to achieve something none of the other gulls around him are attempting. In doing so, he catapults himself to a different level of consciousness, where he finds other birds who have gone before. Eventually he yearns to go back to where he came from, to teach other gulls how to fly. He does so and finds a student, and then more students, and he shows them what he's learned. They learn it too, and become teachers in their turn.

Jonathan's story of breaking through limitations and then going back to coach others on how to do the same remains a terrific metaphor for spiritual growth. Once we overcome a specific spiritual hurdle, the sometimes astonishing results make perfect sense to us, although they may still seem strange to those still have this hurdle to overcome. We yearn for others to experience the same blessings we have, so we share what we've learned.

The only thing I might add to that from my vantage point of today is the idea that everyone has something to teach me, no matter what I've already overcome. Jonathan's story is somewhat linear, meaning progression comes in an orderly fashion and all who are growing take the same path. At different rates, perhaps, but they move "ahead" through the same steps. Teachers are always teachers, and students are alway students.

But what seems to be happening in my life anyway is breakthroughs of all kinds are occurring in everyone, all the time. I can learn from another's breakthrough even as I'm having my own. One is not more advanced than the other. We're all moving forward together.

Of course there have been Christ figures like Jonathan throughout human history, towering examples of extreme spiritual breakthrough that we can all learn from. Yet I might make the case for it being even more important to the spiritual progress of the race that each and every one of us—the little people, if you will—continually make our own breakthroughs, bit by little bit. We need to take it on individually to encourage humanity's advance collectively.

For most of us, we're neither exclusively the teacher nor the student. We're learning and teaching simultaneously. We have much to contribute and much to gain from this spiritual dialog. We can learn by doing, we can learn from others, we can learn by being teachers ourselves.

The important thing, I think, is to be constantly breaking through.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Deliberate sacrifice

I had to pull out my fat dictionaries for this one.

Blog reader Christine wrote in:

I just read my Daily Thought from Spirituality.com. It said self-immolation was good. I looked it up on the web and Wikipedia said that it was setting onself on fire. I don't get that concept! What could Mrs. Eddy have meant?

"Prayer, watching, and working, combined with self-immolation, are God's gracious means for accomplishing whatever has been successfully done for the Christianization and health of mankind." --Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy

This was one of those times where I thought I knew what MBE meant, but basic research on the Web didn't help me.

It seems that all modern definitions of the word "immolation" include the concept of fire, meaning to literally commit suicide in protest over something by self-combustion. Perhaps this comes from the gruesome image of the Buddhist monk during the Vietnam era who immolated himself. How that, plus prayer, watching and working could be anything close to God's gracious means for humanity's benefit doesn’t really make much sense.

So I pulled out my 1828 Webster's, where it says, "Immolation: the act of sacrificing." The term most likely didn't include fire back when MBE was using it in the late 1800s. It was straight up about sacrifice, which in ancient times started with the fire concept but evolved to giving up something for a higher good. That's a whole lot simpler, and makes more sense. Self-sacrifice is absolutely essential to the progress of humanity, and it fits with MBE's sentiment much better.

This has gotten me thinking about how one image or event can co-opt a concept like that. Self-immolation, at one time a virtuous and spiritually progressive step, has been co-opted by a literal interpretation that is generally seen as tragic. Consequently, we feel justified in avoiding it. But self-sacrifice is actually essential to growth.

And deliberate self-immolation is even more progressive. In his submitting to the crucifixion, Jesus committed the ultimate act of self-immolation. Christians of MBE's day would have understood this even though it had nothing to do with fire. In his sacrifice of himself, he showed us something about the nature of unconditional love.

So MBE is recommending that we emulate Jesus by willingly giving up that which is holding us back and embracing prayer, watching and working. In this way we will move the entire race forward toward deeper spirituality and wellbeing.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Monday, January 15, 2007

Be the America you want to see

Just finished a riveting book that my niece gave me for Christmas (thanks, Becca!). Anyone interested in both spirituality and politics should read it: Tempting Faith by David Kuo (now a blogger at beliefnet).

From the dust jacket:

Kuo came to Washington wanting to use his Christian faith to end abortion, strengthen marriage, and help the poor. He reached the heights of political power … Yet his experience was deeply troubling. … Instead of following the teachings of Jesus to serve the needy, Kuo found himself helping to manipulate religious faith for political gain.

Biting stuff, very behind-the-scenes and creepy. I even felt the overall book was bipartisan, in the sense that both parties do this kind of thing. Yeek.

The political debate is heating up here in the US. The next two years will be intense as we gear up for the presidential election. So this passage from Christian author C.S. Lewis, which Kuo quotes multiple times in his book, are worth a look in preparation. It's from The Screwtape Letters, where a powerful demon is instructing a novice on how to derail a Christian (and remember, Lewis was British).

Let him begin by treating patriotism … as part of his religion. Then let him, under the influence of partisan spirit, come to regard it as the most important part. Then quietly and gradually nurse him on to the stage at which the religion becomes merely a part of the "cause," in which Christianity is valued chiefly because of the excellent arguments it can produce … [O]nce he's made the world an end, and faith a means, you have almost won your man, and it makes very little difference what kind of worldly end he is pursuing.

In many ways, Kuo's book answered for me why it is that everyone runs on the platform of helping the poor, but so few actually do so once in office. It sounds good, and the trusting voters believe they mean it. But politics and partisanship prevent real progress from happening for a diabolically myriad range of reasons.

Perhaps Christianity and politics are like oil and water—they just don't really mix. And sadly, it's the Christianity that becomes corrupt in the process of trying, rather than politics becoming uplifted.

Kuo's closing point is this: that we need to stop thinking of government as the source of all goodness. In other words, we need to take it on ourselves to be the change we want to see. In order to be a country that helps the poor, we need to be individuals who help the poor.

We should be involved in the political process. We should strive to make a difference with our volunteering and our votes. But you can't spiritualize a country from the top down. Actually making America kinder and gentler is the ultimate grassroots effort. And each of us is an essential blade of grass.

God has endowed man with inalienable rights, among which are self-government, reason, and conscience. Man is properly self-governed only when he is guided rightly and governed by his Maker, divine Truth and Love. --Science and Health

Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Friday, January 12, 2007

Credit where credit is due

Got an interesting email from a blog reader. It read in part:

I am bringing this topic up to you because you seem to be a well-read open-minded seeker of Truth. One thing I have noticed in visiting Christian Science sites is that Christian Scien[tists] seem on the surface to be somewhat insular when it comes to reading material.

I love some of the writings that Christian Science offers. … At the same time, though, I like other metaphysical authors. I am very eclectic myself and somewhat of a syncretist, so I like studying different sources.

Maybe this is something you would like to bring up for discussion.

And here's my edited-for-blog reply:

Thanks for your note. You make a great point.

I've observed some of that insularity myself, and in fact used to be that way. But, my own intellectual curiosity caught up with me—I love reading too much to reject anything out of hand. Truth is universal, and it finds expression in myriad diverse ways. Isn't that cool?

Sometimes it seems to me that avoiding certain reading material can sometimes betray an insecurity with one's own beliefs. Having said that, there are some authors that I do avoid because having sampled them I've found they just irritate me. But at least I sampled them!

Sometimes students of Christian Science may have a problem with a particular author because his or her work is derivative without giving Mary Baker Eddy any credit. Many now well-known authors studied Christian Science early in their careers but do not mention it in their writings. Eddy had a lot of trouble with people plagiarizing her works even in her own day, so her followers feel especially honor-bound to make sure she gets credit for her ideas.

When I read some of the literature from these other writers, I find a lot that echoes Eddy's writings but then no mention of her and her ideas. I have to admit this troubles me. I don't mind people taking the ideas and running with them in their own way, but at least give credit where credit is due.

I will definitely give this some more thought, and will probably blog about it. (Just about everything winds up on the blog!) Would love to know any further thoughts you have.

Thanks for your support and interest.... I'm so glad to know you're out there!

Warmly,

Laura


Thoughts, anyone? What have you read lately?


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

The great forwarding debate

Reminder: Spiritual Open House this weekend!
Email me to sign-up.

Interestingly, the blog entry from yesterday sparked some strong feelings likening memorized prayers to forwarded emails -- in the sense of how we communicate with our friends, both Divine and human.

Emily said...

I have friends who steadfastly refuse to send me real e-mail messages, opting instead to send me one forward after another, each with a cutesy story, a few platitudes about friendship, and a manipulative note at the bottom accusing me of being "too busy for my friends" if I don't forward the message to everybody in my address book. …

Of course forwards have their place. Every now and then, I'll run across something funny or sweet that makes me think of someone I know, and I'll send it along. But even then, I try to copy and paste the message into the body of an e-mail, take off the obnoxious note at the bottom demanding the recipient forward it to everybody in his address book, and top it with a personal note about why I am sending it so the person will know that I am sending it just to him, and I am sending it because I read it and thought he would enjoy it -- not because I am trying to avoid the supposedly dire consequences of breaking a chain letter or whatever.

I think reciting prayer -- "vain repetition," Jesus called it -- is like forwarding an e-mail: If you want it to mean anything to the recipient, you had better take the time to understand it yourself, your heart had better be in it, and you had better do a little more than simply send it on without even bothering to remove the old headers.

I pray the Daily Prayer every morning, as Mrs. Eddy asks the members of her church to do -- but I try my best to make sure I'm thinking about it, expanding on each piece of it in my thought and finding new meaning in its words, instead of thoughtlessly clicking "forward" and considering that a sufficient substitute for real communication with God.

Read the complete comment here.

Miki said...

Thank you both, Laura and Emily, for an inspiring post. I SO relate to what Emily says about the "forwards"!!

I love memorizing hymns (I also think of them as prayers) because I often find they jog me into right thinking and from there hopefully into right action!

I awoke one morning reciting a favourite hymn from the Christian Science hymnal: "What is thy birthright, man, Child of the perfect One?" (382) I felt this was an answer to recent prayers concerning a family member being challenged with aging, frailty and dementia. My siblings and I are taking turns at caring for her.

At one of our family "conferences" recently I shared another favourite: "In heavenly Love abiding" (148). The beautiful words of this hymn lifted our thoughts above the effects of a gloomy medical prognosis we had heard earlier in the day. The last verse goes:

Green pastures are before me,
Which yet I have not seen;
Bright skies will soon be o'er me,
Where darkest clouds have been.
My hope I cannot measure,
My path in life is free;
My Father has my treasure,
And He will walk with me.

Some members shared their fears and feelings - others asked forgiveness for harsh judgments, misunderstandings, etc. It was a great evening filled with divine Love's presence! One of our nieces wrote the hymn out in full, and it is now on the fridge door for all to read. Harmony and joy continue to mark our family dealings with one another as we pray through this situation. How awesome to know that God hears our prayers - and answers before we call!

That's my favorite hymn.

And this wonderful contribution from Anonymous...

My boss' husband is out of work right now and diligently going to interviews and sending out resumes and doing all the other things one does when one hopes to find a position. My boss, for her part, is praying and trying to maintain a positive attitude about the situation. She told me, though, that she feels almost embarassed to be asking God for help all the time. I told her that her husband will find the job he's supposed to have, at the time he's supposed to have it, if it doesn't find him first. I also told her to try a different tack with her prayer tomorrow morning. Instead of asking God to do something for her, try asking what He wants her to do for Him, and ask for the wisdom to recognize it when He sends her the answer. She was somewhat shocked by the idea, but she liked it.

Great advice to your boss! Please tell us how it turns out.

And then, haha, to read a little parable about why we forward jokes, click here (of course, I found out about it from a friend who forwarded it to me!).

As for myself, I enjoy a good forwarded joke when it's clear I'm not just one of the sender's 200 closest friends. And I like it when people demonstrate an understanding of email etiquette and don't include everyone's address in the email.

In other words, it's got to feel personal, even if it's a forward. Which is really what Emily's talking about in her comment for when you talk with God. You might use a memorized prayer, but you can always make the thought behind it new every time.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Your best Friend

I've talked before about memorizing passages. I really like this little reminder I found on the Calvary Missions site:

What About Memorized Prayers?

There may be a place for memorized prayers, such as the "Lord's Prayer," a child's bedtime prayer, a child's mealtime prayer or something that you have found that expresses what is really in your heart. However, would your intelligence be insulted if your closest friends or relatives only talked to you in memorized speeches? How about an all-intelligent God who wants a personal relationship with his people? He wants us to talk to him out of our heart and out of our intellect.

I think that's a really good point! I tried to imagine my best friend calling me up and rather than updating me on her life or asking about mine, she just rattled off something she'd told me a million times before. Verbatim. What would happen to the friendship after a time? Wouldn't really go anywhere.

And God, Spirit, Love is our best friend. Do we trust Him enough to share our deepest hopes, our secret longings? Here's a well-known passage from Mary Baker Eddy (which I happen to have memorized!):

Desire is prayer; and no loss can occur from trusting God with our desires, that they may be moulded and exalted before they take form in words and in deeds.

--Science and Health

Friendship is based on trust. To think of the Divine as a friend, then, there has to be a measure of trust there. Thinking of God as a evaluator or judge may make this difficult; thinking of Him as infinite, all-powerful Love who is entirely on your side and has got your back might make it easier. Thinking of Him as a Her might also sometimes help—not only as the Mother who comforts, but as the BFF (best friend forever) who is always there for you to listen and stand up.

So, once you've bonded with this Friend, it would be natural to bring your very life to the conversation. There's nothing you wouldn't tell this Friend. You've got no worry whether you'll be accepted, this Friend always loves you and backs you up. Not against other people, but against any evil that lurks around the edges of your life. And this Friend will fight to save you.

So tell Him/Her what's on your mind today. Just free form, no formula, no memorized phrases. Let Him/Her know what you really think, and see what He/She says back.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

The spiritual authority to relax

Got a funny little book from my daughter for Christmas: The Tao of Pooh. It's definitely amusing along with being thought-provoking, and I think on some level I learned something about the Tao, a bit about Confucianism and even a smidge about Buddha. Although without re-reading my Winnie-the-Pooh as well, I can't quite be sure.

Anyway, here's a comforting excerpt:

[Q]uite often, the easiest way to get rid of a Minus is to change it to a Plus. Sometimes you will find that characteristics you try hard to eliminate eventually come back, anyway. But if you do the right things, they will come back in the right ways. And sometimes those very tendencies that you dislike the most can show up in the right way at the right time to save your life, somehow. … There are things about ourselves that we need to get rid of; there are things we need to change. But at the same time, we do not need to be too desperate, too ruthless, to combative. Along the way to usefulness and happiness, many of those things will change themselves, and the others can be worked on as we go. The first thing we need to do is recognize and trust our own Inner Nature, and not lose sight of it.

I liked that. It kind of told me to relax a bit. I perhaps didn't read this little philosophical book with entirely the right spirit—I argued mentally with most of it as I read—but one overall impression I did get was that we have the spiritual authority to relax.

For after all, we have all eternity. I believe that existence is a constant state of progression. We're never "done," so there's no need to "push." How much good can we do right now, with what we have? It seems to me that the Divine works within us to make it clear when we need to take out the tools and get the job done.

There's a balance between wanting to grow as rapidly as possible and loving ourselves enough to take it as it comes. This point of balance I think is where happiness is. Consciously dwelling at that point brings a serenity—or that's what I'm conjecturing, since I'm not there all that often! But when I am there, there's a fulfilled peace that seems more real than all the rushing around I do normally.

What I liked about the above quoted passage is that it's saying that goodness comes forth naturally. Growth happens despite our best efforts to rush it or thwart it. This coincides with my belief that being the image and likeness of God is irresistible. It's our very nature, so can't be hidden forever, but will burst forth like apple blossoms in the spring.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Monday, January 08, 2007

The assumption of health

Reminder: Spiritual Open House this weekend!
Email me to sign-up.


Terrific column from the New York Times forwarded to me by a friend: What’s Making Us Sick Is an Epidemic of Diagnoses. [If you can't access the article, let me know and I'll send you a copy.] After making the argument that it's over-diagnoses that is making most of us feel sick, the column concludes:

As more of us are being told we are sick, fewer of us are being told we are well. People need to think hard about the benefits and risks of increased diagnosis: the fundamental question they face is whether or not to become a patient. And doctors need to remember the value of reassuring people that they are not sick. Perhaps someone should start monitoring a new health metric: the proportion of the population not requiring medical care. And the National Institutes of Health could propose a new goal for medical researchers: reduce the need for medical services, not increase it.

This really hit home for me. I think what these columnists (three doctors contributed to the story) are saying makes so much sense.

Now, I would never fault someone for seeking medical care. I'm always grateful for decreased suffering, however it comes. Modern medicine can do some amazing things, especially in the realm of surgery. Some of the discoveries are important to my daily life, such as how to keep clean and how to care for cuts, etc. I also think some of the discoveries in the areas of nutrition and exercise—i.e., eat natural foods, move around regularly doing something you enjoy—are beneficial to a sense of physical wellbeing.

But I do want to admit to some things that when I've confessed them to new friends they're nothing short of astonished: I've never been to a medical doctor (just dentist and eye doctor). I've never had a shot (except Novocain). I've never taken an aspirin. I've never had a physical. Never had a Pap smear, a mammogram or any of the other unpleasant tests I've heard described. Never even had my blood taken (although my midwives both tried it and couldn't get it to work). Don’t know my blood type.

Sometimes people react by thinking that perhaps that's irresponsible. But many others respond with a wistful sigh—You've never had to go to a doctor? And I've realized that I'm not just avoiding shots and tests, but also a life of doctors' offices in-and-out. A life of anxiety about my health, of waiting with bated breath for the outcome of some test that will tell me whether I can have a normal life or not.

The fact is, I walk through life assuming that I'm healthy. My mindset, through the training I've received through Christian Science, gives me confidence and strength. I don't wonder if a sniffle will turn into pneumonia, or if an ache is the onset of arthritis. I'm in the habit of dismissing these things as inconsequential—which is what they then become.

Christian Science also got me in the habit of avoiding alcohol, tobacco and caffeine. Again, I don't fault anyone for their use of these products, but they're not a part of my lifestyle. I'm convinced that the fact that people regularly think I'm 15 years younger than I am (someone actually thought my college-aged daughter and I were sisters recently) is attributable to this lifestyle. (Well, maybe that and my hair coloring.)

Christian Science is effective, proactive, preventative health care. It decreases fear, which decreases stress. Not to mention how much inspiration and joy it's brought me over the years, an abiding closeness to God, and help when I needed it. I wish more people would check it out, because it really works.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Friday, January 05, 2007

Response to a comment

I received a nice, loving note from Culley yesterday, who cares enough about my soul to have written in detail some objections to Christian Science. Culley's comments seem to indicate that she? he? believes in a literal reading of the Bible. Read the entire note in the comments here.

So thank you for writing, Culley, but I hope you'll respect my differing point of view. I also hope you can see that it's possible to coexist spiritually without having to change each other.

You know, I’m sure, that the Bible story you reference (Lazarus and Dives) is an example of Jesus' parables. I don't believe Jesus was saying these things happened in actual fact. Jesus crafted his parables to make a spiritual point, and he used metaphors his listeners would understand.

And when you imply that since God is perfect, the Bible must be as well, I feel bound to remind you that while yes, inspiration from God is perfect, it's still human beings who had to write it down. Human beings make mistakes and/or don't always get it right. The Bible then remains as a living testament to inspiration that requires inspiration on our part to read and to understand.

To me, reverence for Jesus Christ and a study of the Bible is the foundation of my spiritual growth. I am deeply committed to following the Way that Jesus exemplified. I do believe Jesus' died "for our sins," which to me means he was crucified because he came to a world struggling with sin, which he challenged and which fought back. In gratitude for what he did, I continue to fight the battle against sin in myself, and to help others when they request it.

No, I don't believe heaven and hell are actual places. Did not Jesus say, "The kingdom of heaven is within you"? To me, this means that heaven is a state of mind. It is alignment with the Mind that is God. When we are aligned with this Mind, we experience heaven. When we are out of synch with this Mind, we experience discord, hell.

Thank you, Culley, for your suggestion that I consider calling upon Jesus as a way to gain salvation. I appreciate your wanting to help me, and I'm sure accepting Jesus in the way you describe has comforted you. Jesus is the Way, but you and I each have chosen a different "way" to grow closer to him. My conviction is that we're both headed in the same direction, and I hope someday you'll see that, too.

I'd be happy to talk with you if you want. Much love.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Del.icio.us tags:

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Spirit's success story

What is success? I guess I've always thought of it as something that is measured externally. Meaning, you can tell if a person is successful by what they've achieved or built or earned. But I saw a movie over the weekend that's making me think that maybe success is something else again: Will Smith's Pursuit of Happyness.

As you may know, it's the based-on-a-true-story of Chris Gardner, a down-and-out salesman who is failing at supporting his wife and son. He's talented at sales, but has a crappy product that's next to impossible to sell. He stumbles on the opportunity to take an unpaid internship for six months to become a stock broker. His fed up, overstretched wife leaves him, and he and his son wind up homeless as he struggles to excel enough as an intern to earn the coveted job at the end.

It's unreal what he has to go through to make it through those six months. For every set back, he finds a next step. Sometimes his choices are foolish, other times they are nothing short of heroic. Of course, you're rooting for him throughout. He never gives up.

I love this quote: "Success consists of getting up just one more time than you fall" (Oliver Goldsmith). It's occurring to me now that Gardner's success was not something that happened all at once at the end of the story. Success was a part of him throughout. It was inherent in his nature, and he refused to let anything else be the outcome. At various times, he showed humility, grace, willingness and tenacity. He kept his self-respect no matter what was happening. He could let the smaller slights go because he kept his eyes on the goal—being able to support his son.

So I'm thinking today that success is more of an internal quality than I thought. It's a state of mind, something we consent to, that we insist upon. We need to see it as part of our identity, part of our makeup. It is who we are, not what we do. What we do is the outcome of the mental state of success within.

And, because we're the direct emanation of the infinitely successful divine Spirit, we don't ever need to question whether we're allowed to think of ourselves as a success. Spirit succeeds at whatever it does. Since we're made by Spirit, we're each an instance of Spirit's success. It stands to reason then that each of our lives can and should be an ongoing example of Spirit's success story.

You are the star of Spirit's success story. Take on this role within, and you'll see the results outwardly.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

God's got it covered

This came in from a blog visitor last week:

I'm new to the whole thought process of Christian Science, and I never really understood how Principle fit in. I'm just looking to understand how it is used in this context, the rest I can comprehend and am working through understanding, but Principle baffles me completely!

If you could spare a minute of your time to give me some input I would more than appreciate it.

Thank you!

Principle, as you may know, is one of the seven synonyms for God used in Science and Health, the others being Mind, Soul, Spirit, Life, Truth, Love. The word is used in contexts like this:

Adhesion, cohesion, and attraction are properties of Mind. They belong to divine Principle, and support the equipoise of that thought-force, which launched the earth in its orbit and said to the proud wave, "Thus far and no farther."--p. 124

Harmony is produced by its Principle, is controlled by it and abides with it. Divine Principle is the Life of man. Man's happiness is not, therefore, at the disposal of physical sense. --p. 304

All things are created spiritually. Mind, not matter, is the creator. Love, the divine Principle, is the Father and Mother of the universe, including man. --p. 256

Principle is imperative. You cannot mock it by human will. Science is a divine demand, not a human. Always right, its divine Principle never repents, but maintains the claim of Truth by quenching error. --p. 329

The divine Principle, or Spirit, comprehends and expresses all, and all must therefore be as perfect as the divine Principle is perfect. --p. 518

I like to think of Principle as the Law. Not human laws, defined by a legislature or magistrate, but as analogous to physical laws that govern the universe, such as the law of gravity. Principle governs all creation, and is the force that keeps it all together and makes everything work. Principle is God's Law, which to me means that which cannot be disobeyed because it's simply the way things are.

What's amazing to me about this outlook is that it's not optional. In Christian Science, the conjecture that we have the option to be anything other than the perfect expression of the Divine is a total fallacy, an illusion. Perfection is defined by its Principle, which pervades all existence. If we exist at all, we exist within that perfect Principle and are governed by it. Imperfection does not exist, because it implies an imperfect creator.

This idea frees me to accept perfection about myself even as I work through the challenges I'm facing in the here-and-now. I know that perfection is 100% spiritual, so I become less pressured about trying to force perfectionism on the human scene. I'm more patient with my own foibles and those of others because I know they will fall away through an increased understanding of perfection, which will come in God's good time. In the meantime, I laugh a lot.

Principle helps me to laugh. Knowing that God's Law of Harmony is in operation, perfect and consistent, gives me the confidence and equanimity to relax. I can laugh when faced with the absurdities of human existence, since I know God's got it covered.


Your ideas and inspiration are welcome! Please comment below or Contact Laura.
Email this posting to a friend with the envelope icon below.